A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among prospective neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to create their loved ones residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of established people. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web-site, leading to an encroachment with a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially designed, is in the proper position. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their look at, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal scheduling disputes, in which sights of The ocean are both hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment in the lawful timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just trying to make a family property in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed depending on Experienced guidance and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include coming into The ocean through a storm, do not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about design of wall at coastal web page has become a shorthand description for a situation that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions report about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much approach.
As the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely proceed to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.