A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted nationwide awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such parts are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, which can be partially crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely noted that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a region impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read even more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment during the authorized timeline.
Within the Main from the dispute is usually a disagreement over boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of planning files, maps, and ailments connected towards the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their action is determined by problem for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extensive-standing connection to the realm and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair merely looking to create a family members household in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Special Area of Conservation and say that every one performs have already René Collier been carried out according to Expert tips and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, like getting into The ocean for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page has become a shorthand description for a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced Formerly been associated with regional advocacy on planning and environmental issues, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from really different Experienced backgrounds can find on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-higher water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of waistline-significant h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both equally the Bodily truth in the coastline and the symbolic character of the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an excessive technique.
Since the High Court proceedings continue, the result stays unsure. The courtroom should decide whether or not the wall as designed complies with arranging authorization and no matter if any encroachment into a Exclusive Location of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and setting up problems. Yet the human component remains central: neighbours who need to Dwell along with each other extended after the legal fees are actually compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction will work at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually be altered, taken off, or accomplished as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.